Re: [hylafax-users] Received faxed cut to few lines

[Tim Rice <tim@multitalents.net>]

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Lee Howard wrote:

> At 11:20 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Tim Rice wrote:
> >On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Lee Howard wrote:
> >
> >> At 01:33 PM 2/2/01 +0100, mamboman@gmx.ch wrote:
> >> 
> >> >I am using:
> >> >Hylafax 4 Beta 2-l35
> >> >libtiff 3.4-0
> >> >tiff 3.4-0
> >> >on Suse Linux 6.4 i386
> >> 
> >> Yeah, libtiff/HylaFAX incompatibility.  You need libtiff 3.5.x.
> >> 
> >
> >libtiff 3.4 should be fine.
> >In fact the pre CVS code base requires it.
> 
> Okay, I could be wrong, but I *thought* that SuSE RPM hylafax-4.1beta2-135
> was a binary created from CVS by the SuSE folk.  And because they compiled
> it on a system with libtiff-3.5.x, it is necessary to use libtiff-3.5.x if
> you're using the RPM.
> 
> At least, that's the way it appeared when I reviewed the latest versions at
> SuSE a number of months ago.

You are probably right.
I keep thinking in terms of compiling from source.

Wouldn't a binary RPM complain on the about the wrong version of libtiff?
I supose the user could have done a --nodeps 

> 
> Lee.
> 

-- 
Tim Rice				Multitalents	(707) 887-1469
tim@multitalents.net




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null