![]() |
On Wednesday, August 16, 2000, at 1:36:35 PM, Lee Howard wrote: >>I was searching the mailing list archive the other day for something >>else, and saw several postings that people were running just fine with >>USR products; it might be productive for those of you having problems >>to do some searching there and see what you find. > I've got a 3Com-USR 56K modem internal that's working fine with HylaFAX in > Class 2.0. They do fine with faxing and they do fine with data. Their > biggest downside is the lack of error checking and reporting in the > firmware - which has been the biggest difficulty in getting Class 2.0 > modems to work with HylaFAX (because the firmware lies about its > capabilities). It might well have been your posting; that sounds familiar. So it's just a question of hardwiring the real caps in the config file, right? > As a plus, though, I have noticed that 3Com-USR modems in general are much > more tolerant of line noise and static, and so I've rarely seen any > corrupted scan lines on any fax received by a 3Com-USR modem. I've suggested to Joe that adding a category to Bugzilla for reports of working modems, with attached config files, might be a good idea. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff The Suncoast Freenet Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015 ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null