![]() |
At 01:15 PM 8/16/00 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: >> Hey, I have the same problem :) The remote just doesn't understand the >> gibberish setup the USR is sending... >> I think those modems just aren't very compatible with the other ones. >> IIRC, they always had that problem, also for data connections... > >Well, I can't speak for the Sportsters (of which I believe that >internal is one), but the Couriers always performed flawlessly with >data connections. > >I was searching the mailing list archive the other day for something >else, and saw several postings that people were running just fine with >USR products; it might be productive for those of you having problems >to do some searching there and see what you find. I've got a 3Com-USR 56K modem internal that's working fine with HylaFAX in Class 2.0. They do fine with faxing and they do fine with data. Their biggest downside is the lack of error checking and reporting in the firmware - which has been the biggest difficulty in getting Class 2.0 modems to work with HylaFAX (because the firmware lies about its capabilities). As a plus, though, I have noticed that 3Com-USR modems in general are much more tolerant of line noise and static, and so I've rarely seen any corrupted scan lines on any fax received by a 3Com-USR modem. Lee Howard ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null