![]() |
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:47:58 -0400, you wrote: >Fascinating!! I had the same problem of Richard, twice. > 1. What makes you think you can believe that remote CSI? In my case the remote end called saying it had received a fax that was not meant for them. The CSI was right. > 2. Was 219 398-1194 truly the last number dialed? In my case it happened just after a failed attempt to another number. > 3. Can you reproduce this in any controlled way? No. >Looks to me like their CSI is "lying", . . . if you use a conventional fax machine who do In my case the CSI was not lying. I already posted twice about this issue on the list. Dmitry told me it's impossible that hylafax does this. However now I see I'm not the only one to have this problem. It happened with 2 different modems (different brands). I've still the logs I sent to Dmitry if you want to see them. c00006297 -> c00006300. fax1 failed to number1 fax2 failed to number2 fax1 goes to number2 fax2 goes to number2 --> fax1 and fax2 to number2 another example: c00002135 -> 2139 fax1 failed to number1 fax2 failed to number2 fax3 goes to number1 fax4 failed to number4 fax1 goes to number1 --> fax1 and fax3 to number1 -- giulioo@pobox.com ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null