![]() |
Bernd Proissl wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ulrich.Eckhardt@transcom.de [mailto:Ulrich.Eckhardt@transcom.de] > > > > > what about corba ? There are free corba implementations for Linux > > and windows available. > yes, i have CORBA in my mind also, but no broad experience, e.g. how to > setup > naming services, whether they are necessary at all in this environemnt... > > Do you have experience i CORBA? If you want you may send me private email > to discuss this? Hi, i have only a very limited theoretical background. I would love to have more time for experimenting with corba. > > > why do you want to use ole on windows and no ole on unix? > > > > ... pipes does not work on Windows. > Please, can you be more specific? Whats the problem with "does not work on Windows" ? Ok, Windows NT has some sort of strange pipes, but not Windows 95/98. On Unix you can simply say something like <programm a> | <programm b> where programm a may be the print spooler and programm b your programm (including some commandline parameters). On Windows you have to implement an OLE or ActivX server in programm b. Programm a should store the main data to a temorary file (depends on the size of the data) and pass the parameters via ole/active x. Uli -- Ulrich Eckhardt Tr@nscom http://www.uli-eckhardt.de http://www.transcom.de Lagerstra�e 11-15 A8 64807 Dieburg Germany