![]() |
Hi all, I have just noticed that there seem to be quite a few places in 4.1beta[12] where group and user IDs get mixed. In my setup (that has more or less randomly generated user/group IDs due to a lot of testing and the user of useradd/groupadd commands), this leads to the situation that hylafax related programs run with group IDs they shouldn't run with. I tracked this down to numerous places where there is code like (this has been grepped out of the source: faxd/faxApp.c++: if (setegid(pwd->pw_uid) < 0) ^ ^^^ Which does not make sense (at least not to me). The above snippet ends up as code in (at least) faxgetty, which in turn calls faxrcvd (or a replacement) belonging to a wrong group... Could anybody confirm that this is a bug, or is there some other reason that the fax user and its primary group must have the same ID. Is this documented somewhere? I have attached the tiny patch for this thingy... [But not yet tested its implications] peter
*** hylafax-4.1beta2/faxd/faxApp.c++ Sun Jun 13 09:41:05 1999 --- hylafax-4.1beta2/faxd/faxApp.c++.fixed Tue May 9 21:43:23 2000 *************** *** 426,430 **** "This software is not installed properly!", FAX_USER); if (euid == 0) { ! if (setegid(pwd->pw_uid) < 0) faxApp::fatal("Can not setup permissions (gid)"); if (seteuid(pwd->pw_uid) < 0) --- 426,430 ---- "This software is not installed properly!", FAX_USER); if (euid == 0) { ! if (setegid(pwd->pw_gid) < 0) faxApp::fatal("Can not setup permissions (gid)"); if (seteuid(pwd->pw_uid) < 0)