![]() |
Hi, At 11:49 PM 6/1/99 -0400, David A. De Graaf wrote: >After much effort I've achieved a successful compile of hylafax on Red >Hat 6.0. My problem is I don't know who's in charge here. Who's >assembling all the bits to bring this wonderful package up to date? I have being incorporating patches into the main distribution for a couple of months. The results are posted semi-regularly to the ftp://ftp.hylafax.org/pub/hylafax/source/BETA/ directory. There is also a cvs tree publically available see: http://www.hylafax.org/archive/1999-05/msg00140.php look also here: http://www.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi for details on the changes. A web page formalizing all this will probaly be done sometime(as soon as God agrees to my request to put a few more hours into each day ;-) >Is anyone working toward a new release incorporating the myriad >patches and improvements? I would like my experience not to be >repeated by countless others. The details, nearly 800 lines, are too >big for this newsgroup. There are a couple of minor source code things stopping a release, but the major problem by far is the html documentation which really needs some updating. >Briefly, I started with hylafax-v4.0pl2-tar.gz, added nearly all the >patches from www.hylafax.org/patches/index.php, plus Robert >Colquhoun's patch for util/Dispatcher.c++. This devil's brew resulted >in a configure script that wouldn't run. There probaly should be a link on the patches page to the BETA directory and the cvs stuff to avoid this, at least until a formal release is out. >After much editing, it now does run correctly and all warning messages >are gone except for three from Socket.h that I don't know how to fix, >but seem innocuous. I fixed a few errors in some of the patches, and >had to edit out some lines from port.h that provoke warnings. Could you try the latest beta release, currently posted to: http://www.trump.net.au/~rjc/hylafax/ which will be on ftp.hylafax.org sometime soon, it should build cleanly. - Robert