![]() |
RE>Re: RE>flexfax: Problem with fax_ 22/2/99 Hi. <HeadBangOnDesk> Of course you are right, Tim. Apologies all round for my misinformation. The clue to this the the message from Faxgetty when FaxSend picks up the port: FaxGetty:[341]: ANSWER: Can not lock modem device If it wasn't watching with it's hands off the port, how could we send faxes? </HeadBangOnDesk> Michael :) -------------------------------------- Date: 22/2/99 8:07 AM To: Michael Firkins From: Tim Rice On 19 Feb 1999, Michael Firkins wrote: > RE>flexfax: Problem with fax receiving > 19/2/99 > Hi. > I can't really help you with hylafax receiving, but I can explain why cu > works with mgetty and not faxgetty. It is to do with the way they are > structured: > > mgetty does not hold the lock on the port. It waits there and watches > for valid data "RING" etc and then takes it and sets a lock. This means > that other programs, (minicom, cu, pppd etc) can pick up the port and > lock it (except when mgetty is actively using it or resetting it after > a session). > > Faxgetty on the other hand sets a lock when it is invoked from inittab > and there it stays. Hylafax owns that port and you would have to kill ^^^^ > off faxgetty to get the port back so that cu can access it. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ That's not so. If HylaFAX is configured correctly, cu & uucico work just fine while faxgetty is running. All the programs need to use the same lockfile name and the same type of lockfile. > > Good luck, > > Michael > -------------------------------------- > Date: 19/2/99 8:05 AM > To: Michael Firkins > From: Alex Povolotsky > Hello! > > I'm trying to set up fax receiving using a _VERY_ good Class2 modem. It > works > just fine with mgetty, but all my efforts to set it up with faxgetty > fails. > > I've tried every combination of speed and flow control I could invent > (19200, > 38400 and 57600, with soft, hard and no flow for 19200, soft and hard > for > 38400) but always gets Missing EOL in 5 seconds. > > For some unknown reason, cu fails to work with modem _TOGETHER_ with > faxgetty. > Together with mgetty it works just fine. > > Setup strings for mgetty and faxgetty looks identical. > > I'm using latest hylafax (4.0pl2). > > What should I test? What should I look at? Please help. > > Alex. > -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469 (voice) tim@trr.metro.net RFC-822 Header: ---------------------------------------------------- Received: from camco.celestial.com (root@camco.celestial.com [192.136.111.1]) by orbit.senet.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA09573 for <michael@sa.lyppard.com.au>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 17:56:03 +1030 Received: (2596 bytes) by camco.celestial.com via sendmail with P:stdio/D:lists/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp (sender: <owner-flexfax@celestial.com> owner: <owner-flexfax-outbound>) id <m10DikL-0006Soa@camco.celestial.com> for flexfax-outbound; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:45:05 -0800 (PST) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #13 built 1998-Nov-15) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:09:14 -0800 (PST) From: Tim Rice <tim@trr.metro.NET> To: Michael Firkins <michael@sa.lyppard.com.au> cc: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@asteroid.svib.ru>, Hylafax List <flexfax@sgi.com> Subject: Re: RE>flexfax: Problem with fax receiving In-Reply-To: <990219.105821@sa.lyppard.com.au> Message-ID: <Pine.GAS.4.09.9999.9902182103040.26326-100000@trr.metro.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-flexfax@celestial.com Precedence: bulk