![]() |
On 19 Feb 1999, Michael Firkins wrote: > RE>flexfax: Problem with fax receiving > 19/2/99 > Hi. > I can't really help you with hylafax receiving, but I can explain why cu > works with mgetty and not faxgetty. It is to do with the way they are > structured: > > mgetty does not hold the lock on the port. It waits there and watches > for valid data "RING" etc and then takes it and sets a lock. This means > that other programs, (minicom, cu, pppd etc) can pick up the port and > lock it (except when mgetty is actively using it or resetting it after > a session). > > Faxgetty on the other hand sets a lock when it is invoked from inittab > and there it stays. Hylafax owns that port and you would have to kill ^^^^ > off faxgetty to get the port back so that cu can access it. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ That's not so. If HylaFAX is configured correctly, cu & uucico work just fine while faxgetty is running. All the programs need to use the same lockfile name and the same type of lockfile. > > Good luck, > > Michael > -------------------------------------- > Date: 19/2/99 8:05 AM > To: Michael Firkins > From: Alex Povolotsky > Hello! > > I'm trying to set up fax receiving using a _VERY_ good Class2 modem. It > works > just fine with mgetty, but all my efforts to set it up with faxgetty > fails. > > I've tried every combination of speed and flow control I could invent > (19200, > 38400 and 57600, with soft, hard and no flow for 19200, soft and hard > for > 38400) but always gets Missing EOL in 5 seconds. > > For some unknown reason, cu fails to work with modem _TOGETHER_ with > faxgetty. > Together with mgetty it works just fine. > > Setup strings for mgetty and faxgetty looks identical. > > I'm using latest hylafax (4.0pl2). > > What should I test? What should I look at? Please help. > > Alex. > -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469 (voice) tim@trr.metro.net