Re: flexfax: Zoom Telephonics 56Kx

[Nico Kadel-Garcia <raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 20 Oct 1998, John Conover wrote:

> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 20:36:22 -0700
> From: John Conover <conover@inow.com>
> To: flexfax@sgi.com
> Subject: flexfax: Zoom Telephonics 56Kx
> 
> Has anyone tried the Zoom Telephonics 56Kx at
> http://www.zoomtel.com/products/zoom-product-matrix-na.php
> in Class 2 with HylaFax and Linux?

No, but Zoom is famous for being awful. Their company president's
attitude was "get it to market", and he ignored beta-testing or
known bugs in the chipsets.

They are the cheapest for a reason.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNi3NgD/+ItycgIJRAQG7cQP/cZ1008Jf16U5vBhOLLxfl2qZ3xvu6xAf
akJgomBmzlYe2EB+pzsdi56ydEoj9Z7FwobfBdh8AQxEWRShDWcaIcND/sjFLFKc
9XEd3ESI03cc2VShsUKGlI5OwshZ78cLmVkzFTHjqAtK/vC+S/oeHlYGtgz8HcCE
iPsgsviW+NE=
=fiEY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----