![]() |
>>>>> On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, "SO" == Sascha Ottolski wrote: SO> Thats what I think. I did install the RPM last week and it worked out SO> of the box. However, a littel tweaking was necessary to get some of the SO> statistic scripts running. SO> The problem (and the fix) was simple: In the scripts, the logfile was SO> called etc/xferstats and not etc/xferfaxstats. Fixed in the current version, now available from the same place. SO> raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu said: +> 2. The dependencies are bad. The demand for ghostscript 5.10 fonts forces +> one to either over-ride the dependencies or grab contributed fonts. SO> Did install with --nodeps and could not find a problem here (receive-only SO> environment at the moment). SO> raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu said: +> 3. There is an unnecessary dependency in the HylaFAX rpm on the "mawk" +> rpm, when "gawk" is more than sufficient for HylaFAX. SO> Hey, thanks for pointing this one out. On my stock RedHat-5.1 SO> xferfaxstats produced wrong statistics (didn't make snseful things SO> when using -since). After about an hour of testing I changed $AWK in SO> setup.cache and voila, now the output makes sense. You were both right, the RPM now uses gawk. SO> Another small note: There seems to be a typo in the .spec-file. The SO> output of rpm -qi hylafax looks like this: Also fixed! -DPN -- Mr. Arlington Hewes (tpcadmin@info.tpc.int) The TPC.INT Subdomain (http://www.tpc.int/) ************************************************** *** FOR GENERAL INFORMATION *** *** mailto:tpcfaq@info.tpc.int *** *** FOR A LIST OF CURRENT COVERAGE *** *** mailto:tpccover@info.tpc.int *** *** TO REPORT A PROBLEM (read the FAQ first!) *** *** mailto:support@info.tpc.int *** **************************************************