![]() |
You might have problems with the Win95 Postscript printer drivers not keeping your marker string together. I use a similar mechanism to load up faxback pages, and often my markers will be on seperate lines with positioning commands in between the characters. Bill Suetholz Constantin Teodorescu wrote: > > Nico Garcia wrote: > > > > The UNIX print spooling mechanism is quite distinct (though similar in > > form) to the UNIX HylaFAX spool. > > I was imagine the following mechanism: > > All the workstations (Linux and W95) are configured to print to a > network printer with postscript capabilities. > On the server, the documents that must be sent ar coming in a Postscript > format, Ok ? > > That means that a particular text, let's say : > > <HYLAFAX-PHONE-NUMBER=xxxxxxxxx> (the same font, size and > characteristics) > > would be found in the postscript file as clear text. Some simple filters > based on sed or a perl script could extract the phone number from the > file. After that, the file is processed by HylaFax who is rendering him > and send it. > > > The Wintel print spooling mechanism is a convuleted anti-Christ symbol. > > With the above described mechanism, the W95 workstations would print in > the same way. We declare a Postscript printer shared on the server and > send files to it. > > Am I missing something simple that would make this not possible ? > > > The UNIX boxes are a bit different: there are so many ways to send print > > jobs to the print spool, each slightly different, that you've have to > > think hard about how to determine the fax numer, comments, etc. for each > > outgoing fax job. > > Yes. I think that this could be the problem. But could it be solved as I > say ? > > -- > Constantin Teodorescu > FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA