![]() |
> ??? Why aren't you using a simple Postscript driver, such as one of > the Apple Laserwriter drivers, and letting HylaFAX and Sam Leffler's > TIFF libraries cope with it? Many of Microsoft's print drivers are > apparently pretty broken, a frequent source of difficulty for HylaFAX. > And Sam *WROTE* TIFF. Let *HIS* program deal with the transformation > on > the HylaFAX server. > > [Christoph Stotz] Because these documents we print are a bit > "difficult". There > are User-defined Fonts, included images (also Tiff�s), Word-featured > stuff like > Textart and Textboxes and so on. We already tried printing in PS to > hylafax but > most of the documents came not out 1:1. Mostly a Font-Substitution > Problem, but > some things like Textboxes simply doesn�t work when Printing from > Word. > > The 1:1 aspect is really important to our customers. Infact if we > generate some errors > the cost of the mailing will not be paid. > > On the other Hand it is much faster directly generating the TIFF�s on > the Windows machine. > You do not need to convert anything and Postscript would be much > bigger. For a two-page > fax you got 200K Postscript without any Problem. Generating 1600 faxes > you got 320M to > generate, shuffle over the net to the hylafax server, convert, fax > out, and - archive! > > Generating 20K of TIFF seems a little bit easier. > > Even though your faxes may look a lot better, just because of the > higher > resolution.... > > [Christoph Stotz] Indeed. But some of our customers don�t won�t to > pay the higher > transmission time! > > I hope the points I made help you... > > [Christoph Stotz] Thank you for your suggestion any case! You > respond-time is really low! > > > Sincerly yours, > > > Christoph Stotz