![]() |
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, David Woolley wrote: > The problem, I suspect, is that it treats 8250 type UARTs (emulation, not > chipset, now) as though they were any other type, and uses interrupt enable unless you run setserial and tell it it is an 8250, doesn't it pick it up as a 16450? In any case, who still uses 8250 UARTs? I thought they made it a criminal offense to posses such equipment in this day and age. ;-) *duck* But seriously, the last time I saw an 8250 UART was on a single-port serial board I bought for my 10MHz 8088-based XT a good few years ago. I'm running my fax off a Microcom 288s modem connected to a port on a Cyclades 8-port intelligent multi-port serial card. Originally I was using on-board serial ports (i think 16552 uarts) which worked like a charm as well. Regards Greg --------------------------------------------- Gregory Massel CyberSurf Technologies greg@csurf.co.za Tel: +27 31 207-3034 PGP-key on request Fax: +27 31 207-6749 Cell number on request a/h: +27 31 81-4273 ---------------------------------------------