![]() |
>>>>> On Fri, 3 Apr 1998, "SM" == Shuvam Misra wrote: SM> | Thanks for replying Matthias, but why won't anyone address the very SM> technical | -- points raised by Mr. Pollack? SM> Thanks, Darren. I too was beginning to get a little depressed at a total SM> absence of any attempt to address these issues. Unfortunately, I feel the experts, with what time they do have to devote to HylaFAX, are busy trying to figure out the code . . . this list is not haunted by ITU types, and nobody's willing to speak authoritatively about RTN . . . Harald, can you get us a clear statement which supports your feelings on how HylaFAX should behave in the case of RTN neg? SM> While Harald is convinced that the ZyXEL modem is not at fault, your SM> statistical observations are that Hylafax behaves better with other SM> modems. This is definitely true. I recommend cell operators buy Multitechs and save themselves the grief usually. It's possible that they just work out of the box because of a good config file, whereas the stock config file for the ZyXeLs may have a problem. I am not in a position to tell, as I only have MT modems. SM> One other issue that no one seems to be addressing is my phenomenally SM> high frequency of "Transmit Phase B" errors. Will these too go away if I SM> move to a Multitech? I make no guarantees, since I don't understand what's causing yours . . . but feel it is likely. -DPN -- Mr. Arlington Hewes (tpcadmin@info.tpc.int) The TPC.INT Subdomain (http://www.tpc.int/) ************************************************** *** FOR GENERAL INFORMATION *** *** Mail to tpcfaq@info.tpc.int *** *** FOR A LIST OF CURRENT COVERAGE *** *** Mail to tpccover@info.tpc.int *** **************************************************