![]() |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Wed, 18 Feb 1998 Sinisa.Milivojevic@ns.coresinc.com wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, you wrote on subject Re: flexfax: Fwd: Hylafax: > > > >On Wed, 18 Feb 1998 Sinisa.Milivojevic@ns.coresinc.com wrote: > > > >Well, yes, but it sucks. First you would need to split it into > >multiple pages using something like "tiffsplit", renaming the files > >appropriately, and turn *those* into GIF's. That is bulky and asking > >for trouble, and they won't look as good as they might, especially > >when people try to print them: Why not find a set of TIFF viewers that > >will work correctly for your company? Or, if you have spare disk space, > >use Postscript? > > > >I use viewfax under UNIX, and acdsee under Win95, and use a web-server > >to directly serve the HylaFAX TIFF files. > > That is exactly what I would like to know. The format of outgoing faxes > is, judging by what you say, standard TIFF which can be viewed in WWW > browser !!!!!!!! Please confirm. In that case, I would just have to copy > a file to another directory, before it is deleted in "send" method of > SendApp. Wait: are you talking about viewing the *OUTGOING* faxes, or the incoming? In any case, the fax documents are transformed into tiffg3 or tiffg4, depending on your settings. Yes, this is TIFF. No, many graphic viewers cannot handle it properly, being written for more commonly used *versions* of TIFF. Sam Leffler of SGI apparently wrote TIFF, and he wrote the original flexfax and HylaFAX, so I assume it is in fact completely up to the TIFF standards. But what other people do with it to make it usable for them is an adventure in standards.... Nico Garcia Engineer, CIRL Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNOsNjD/+ItycgIJRAQGMdAP/fwurOfuPLfxkhoLDNIURSbYW9i6Nn0MF exkDHPHQX9xF+8RFcn0Frpt25XiFAJhMJGkjzoZMb922ytoV/IngtkmIsGKu+DRH 1vepQH+VFLi4FxWG6F6eeelHWV2A9FYTa14aUFh4++8kp5X0AGgigFITqQrINSk7 SeVXsc1vKpQ= =i8/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----