![]() |
On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, Nico Garcia wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, Eddie Reed wrote: > > > In the process of getting Hylafax running, I get the following error in > > the daily run output: > > > > "Checking the /etc/master.passwd file: > > Login fax is off but still has a valid shell." > > > > > > "/etc/master.passwd has duplicate user id's. > > fax 6 uucp 6" > > > > I changed the following user ID to #8 in the /etc/master.passwd file. > > Bad Linux Admin! No biscuit! For various reasons, uucp and fax really > need to share the same user ID. This has been the subject of much > discussion lately, but it boils down to "making them different will > screw up handing the modem from one program to the other, and will > be much, much too hard to do otherwise." > > > I changed the ownership of the home directory from user uucp to user fax > > > > Now I can finally issue the command sendfx without getting prompted by a > > password, but nothing happens. The command faxstat is not returning any > > output. > > Simply put, you killed it. (No blame, just letting you know.) Change > this back to the same UID as uucp. > > Nico Garcia > Engineer, CIRL > Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary > raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: 2.6.2 > > iQCVAwUBNGssQz/+ItycgIJRAQEaOwP/UXd4T/pheTvp0L3D1lHCzDaU2N1Pba6U > NM/GWT72wG+u7eC0AY26G2FpOEjK9BS4n+EIPOtlmqtvPj6BqdW6O576CCnMw5oC > sT1OvRFkGoPGBTJVugUPOabl8p7Y0WerDEL0BJs7BVzJHRNtHAgIJADi5ALNKgDA > bzt4AdIOJ+Y= > =eiUS > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Yup, I darn killed it. And then erased all configuration files created during install, then reinstalled hylafax from the distribution. Ran faxsetup, ran faxmodem, back to abnormal: Can't use sendfax from command prompt without a password. The strange thing is that I had this working with the very first install!! What threw me off is that snnp takes the same port as stronghold. So I reinstalled hylafax without the snnp and moved stronghold to another port. When I look at the dir with the faxes that went out previously, they report as being sent as "nobody@myhostname.com". Which tells me there is some kind of permissions problem here with some of the dirs and files owned by "fax". REgards Eddie