Re: [hylafax-users] Wich order follows doneq?

[Javi Legido <javi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, maybe.

I must read carefuly the hylafax-server workflow.

Thanks a lot!!!

Javier

On 17/02/2009, Chris Weiss <cweiss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Javi Legido <javi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm running  hylafax-server 2:4.4.4-10.1 on a Debian lenny with a
>> class 1 modem.
>>
>> i think this is the life cycle of a fax:
>>
>> 1. Send the fax with sendfax:
>>
>> request id is 1 (group id 1)
>>
>> 2. The job goes to the queue 1:
>>
>> /var/spool/hylafax/sendq/q1
>>
>> 3. The queue is processed:
>>
>> cat /var/spool/hylafax/status/ttyS0
>>
>> Sending job 1
>>
>> 4. The job goes from 'sendq' to 'doneq'
>> 5. Changes the status of /var/spool/hylafax/status/ttyS0
>>
>> Initializing server
>>
>> Well, I notice that the jobs are not processed following the 'sendq'
>> order:
>>
>> ls -lat /var/spool/hylafax/doneq
>>
>> ...
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    871 feb 16 09:54 q8
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    880 feb 16 09:53 q25
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    877 feb 16 09:53 q7
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    873 feb 16 09:52 q24
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    870 feb 16 09:51 q6
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    859 feb 16 09:49 q4
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    873 feb 16 09:49 q3
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    877 feb 16 09:48 q2
>> -rw-rw----  1 uucp fax    879 feb 16 09:47 q1
>>
>> Can someone tell me if this right? How can I fix it?
>>
>
> did any of them get requeued due to busy signal or something? ?
>


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*