Re: [hylafax-users] More High speed data carrier issues

[Rubin Bennett <rbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 10:08 -0800, Lee Howard wrote:
> Rubin Bennett wrote:
> 
> >One of the more puzzling ones is below (and sorry it's so munged- my
> >client runs Exchange which "helpfully" trashes the "extra" carriage
> >returns):
> >  
> >
> 
> You could do us all a favor by un-munging these before sending them.

Understood- my apolgies...  Next time I'll get a clean copy before I
post.

> >[2:OK] Mar 17 10:38:16.38: [ 5185]: RECV send PPR (partial page request)
> >Mar 17 10:38:16.38: [ 5185]: <-- [10:AT+FRM=98\r] Mar 17 10:38:16.99: [
> >5185]: --> [8:+FCERROR] Mar 17 10:38:16.99: [ 5185]: <--
> >[10:AT+FRM=98\r] Mar 17 10:38:17.47: [ 5185]: --> [8:+FCERROR] Mar 17
> >10:38:17.47: [ 5185]: <-- [10:AT+FRM=98\r] Mar 17 10:38:21.69: [ 5185]:
> >--> [8:+FCERROR] Mar 17 10:38:21.69: [ 5185]: <-- [10:AT+FRM=98\r] Mar
> >17 10:38:26.04: [ 5185]: --> [8:+FCERROR] Mar 17 10:38:26.04: [ 5185]:
> ><-- [10:AT+FRM=98\r] Mar 17 10:38:30.36: [ 5185]: --> [8:+FCERROR] Mar
> >  
> >
> 
> This (you may be glad to hear) is a fax problem (issue with fax 
> protocol), and HylaFAX is able to work around the matter.
> 
> Update to current HylaFAX CVS and then add:
> 
>   Class1AdaptRecvCmd: AT+FAR=1
> 
> or
> 
>   Class1RMPersistence: 1
> 
> (but not both) to your modem config file.
> 
> Lee.
> 
Are those features not implemented in 4.2.0?  I generally try to run
"standard" RPMS if possible to stay out of dependancy hell.  I can build
an RPM if I have to but I definitely prefer not to unless it's
absolutely necessary.

Thanks again for your super fast response.
Rubin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part