![]() |
Hi guys, I tried to apply the pach on a new untarred tiff tree but without success. I then changet the lines in the first part to 451,8 451,8 and it applied the first part but I was unable to apply the seccond part of the patch on line 1284 any hints why ? Rgds Sasa On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 17:18, Marco Gaiarin wrote: > Mandi! Lee Howard > In chel di` si favelave... > > > Hopefully Debian users realize that they're using a very slow-moving > > distribution, especially when it comes to non-security-related issues. > > True, but... as this page say me: > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libtiff&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all > > libtiff 3.6.1 are only on sid/unstable, so if someone on debian hit the > bug, they are using the extremely fast, bleeding edge version, not the > stable, and old, one. > > > Probably no one have informed the debian libtiff mantainer of the bug, > the patch you are speaking about are that: > > http://bugs.hylafax.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=500 > > i think it should simply apply the patch on debian package, if they > have not just done. -- Sasa Ostrouska <sasa.ostrouska@xxxxxxxxx> ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*