![]() |
--- Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Here we expected to receive CSI or DIS, but we got a > corrupt frame. > This could be due to noisy lines, bad modulators on > the devices, PBX, > etc., etc. Well, I try do some more tests passing a couple of tags values of the config.tty files from the older server to the newer one. > > > Jun 17 10:41:28.32: [ 8261]: --> [0:] > > Jun 17 10:41:28.32: [ 8261]: MODEM <Empty line> > > Jun 17 10:41:28.32: [ 8261]: <-- data [1] > > Jun 17 10:41:28.52: [ 8261]: MODEM <Timeout> > > Jun 17 10:41:28.52: [ 8261]: DELAY 200 ms > > Jun 17 10:41:28.72: [ 8261]: No answer (T.30 T1 > > timeout) > > Jun 17 10:41:28.72: [ 8261]: SEND FAILED: JOB 50 > DEST > > XXXXXXXXX ERR No answer (T.30 T1 timeout) > > Jun 17 10:41:28.72: [ 8261]: <-- [9:AT+FTH=3\r] > > Jun 17 10:41:31.27: [ 8261]: --> [0:] > > Jun 17 10:41:31.27: [ 8261]: <-- [5:ATH0\r] > > Jun 17 10:41:36.27: [ 8261]: MODEM <Timeout> > > Jun 17 10:42:06.30: [ 8261]: SESSION END > > But, we never get another peep from the machine. I hope not burned another port in the card :-(. > > > The next log is from a Multitech modem and what is > > strange is that I got a PPS error which, I guess, > > shouldn't appears because ECM was used. > > PPS is with ECM, and yes, you can get a "no response > to PPS" error with > ECM. Did the receiver actually get the fax page? > If so, then the > post-page delays are too short. If not, then the > pre-page delays are > too short. > > Lee. I just make a test, after increasing Class1PPMWaitCmd in 1 second and they get the fax. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*