![]() |
On Tue, 25 May 2004 09:25:49 -0700, Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I assume that in each of these scenarios MMR was used? MMR was used. > Is this easily reproducible to these receivers? Don't know, users say "some receivers sometime/rarely, other receivers often". > Is RTFCC being performed in these situations? Users say today it happened for 3 jobs in a row to the same number, so it happened even without RTFCC being performed (at least twice) > Is the EOR signal being used at all in the send session? Modem was being used in class2.1. Is EOR visible in log if ECM is performed by modem? Today I quickly looked at the logs and they were perfectly clean. I'll see if tomorrow I can check again. >> If there's a problem on the phone line, serial port, whatever, >> shouldn't ECM >> somehow detect this? > >Well, ECM won't particularly *detect* it, but it will be able to detect >the errors that it would create in the data stream and request >retransmissions. Yes, this is what I meant; I expected the modem would pass some kind of error about persistent ecm crc failures to HylaFAX. >I've not had any reported problems like this with V.34-Fax. Would you >mind sharing a log with me? Maybe it will give me some clues. Tomorrow I'll see if I can get a log, but as I said they were class21 and clean. Thanks. -- giulioo@xxxxxxxxx ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*