Re: [hylafax-users] T.30 T2 timeout, expected page not received

[Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2004.04.20 09:59 Andras Kende wrote:
> Recently installed Hylafax 4.1.8 on FreeBSD 5.2.1 with 1 USR 56K
> External
> modem.
>
> Everything good except there is many of the same:
>
> 'T.30 T2 timeout, expected page not received'

> Apr 20 09:23:15.02: [  539]: <-- [11:AT+FRM=146\r]
> Apr 20 09:23:15.80: [  539]: --> [7:CONNECT]
> Apr 20 09:23:15.80: [  539]: RECV: begin page
> Apr 20 09:23:16.84: [  539]: RECV: 3 total lines, 1 bad lines, 1 
> consecutive bad lines
> Apr 20 09:23:16.84: [  539]: RECV: REJECT page quality, 66% good 
> lines (95% required)
> Apr 20 09:23:16.84: [  539]: RECV: end page
> Apr 20 09:23:16.84: [  539]: --> [10:NO CARRIER]
> Apr 20 09:23:16.84: [  539]: <-- [9:AT+FRH=3\r]
> Apr 20 09:23:19.67: [  539]: --> [7:CONNECT]
> Apr 20 09:23:20.39: [  539]: --> [5:ERROR]
> Apr 20 09:23:20.39: [  539]: MODEM Command error
> Apr 20 09:23:20.39: [  539]: FCS error
> Apr 20 09:23:20.39: [  539]: <-- [9:AT+FRH=3\r]
> Apr 20 09:23:20.41: [  539]: --> [7:CONNECT]
> Apr 20 09:23:21.22: [  539]: --> [5:ERROR]

This is probably a USR-specific shortcoming, but it could be due to 
line problems or other issues, so switching modems to something non-USR 
will probably help, but it may not.

> Maybe 10-15% of incoming faxes..
>
> Searched google but didn't find a definitive answer.
>
> Is a quick hack command available,
> or the problem related to the USR modem ??

There's really nothing HylaFAX can do here to improve the result.  The 
modem reports (erroniously) the end-of-page signal (DLE+ETX, NO 
CARRIER).

> Should I just get a Multitech MT5634ZBA-V-V92-NAM ?

It is a good modem.

Lee.

____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*