[hylafax-users] Hrm.... XX ms/scanline values

[An Intrepid HylaFax User <hylafax@xxxxxxxxx>]

I realise the magic ITU documents refer to this nomenclature, but...

Are there actual timing constraints which result from such things:

Oct 15 04:45:27.35: [32647]: REMOTE best 10 ms, 5 ms/scanline
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

As in, if scanlines of fax image data doesn't arrive "in time" to meet those
values, things go badly?  Or is it an "imaging rate" indicator, to signal to
the other side that there's no point in blasting fax data faster than this rate?

=R=

____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx*