Re: [hylafax-users] Damn! Hylafax, Multitech, and distinctive ring

["john andrews" <ml@irelandin1.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: hylafax-users-bounce@hylafax.org
>[mailto:hylafax-users-bounce@hylafax.org]On Behalf Of Lee Howard
>Sent: 21 May 2003 15:57
>To: john andrews
>Cc: Hylafax-Users
>Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] Damn! Hylafax, Multitech, and distinctive
>ring
>
>
>On 2003.05.21 01:46 john andrews wrote:
>
>> Being new to the world of faxing (2 weeks) I decided to go with
>> hylafax
>> (rather than the alternatives EFax or mgetty) because hylafax seemed
>> to be
>> more actively developed and 'enterprise ready'. In the light of the
>> comments
>> above is this analysis correct?
>
>As for active fax development, yes.  HylaFAX is generally more actively
>developed than efax or mgetty's fax side.  efax gets very little
>development at all these days, it seems... 0.9a has been the "latest
>development release" since November 2000.


I have been thoroughly conviced by the various posts on this topic!!! Thanks
also for the interesting replies. So far I have not had any problems with
Hylafax - the only problems have been modem related (A topic 560 modem which
doesn't work with any fax software as far as I can see, since replaced with
a US Robotics which works fine).

John



____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*