HylaFAX The world's
most advanced open source fax server
|
|
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
Re: [hylafax-users] Hylafax vs traditional fax device
thats a very good question and i?d be very interested in the answer as well.
I found out that my fax quality with hylafax is pretty poor (even when set
to "high quality" in cypheus for example)
Daniel "Stonegate" Fischer
-----Original Message-----
From: hylafax-users-bounce@hylafax.org
[mailto:hylafax-users-bounce@hylafax.org]On Behalf Of Duccio Fallani
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:39 AM
To: hylafax-users@hylafax.org
Subject: [hylafax-users] Hylafax vs traditional fax device
If I send the same document by Hylafax and traditional
fax device the quality result is different. I know
the problem is on Ghoscript conversion from Poscript
format into TIFF (dithering???).
How can I obtain the same document result of a traditional
fax with Hylafax/Ghostscript ???
Duccio Fallani
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
*To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
*To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*