HylaFAX The world's most advanced open source fax server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [hylafax-users] Hylafax vs traditional fax device



thats a very good question and i?d be very interested in the answer as well.

I found out that my fax quality with hylafax is pretty poor (even when set
to "high quality" in cypheus for example)


Daniel "Stonegate" Fischer

-----Original Message-----
From: hylafax-users-bounce@hylafax.org
[mailto:hylafax-users-bounce@hylafax.org]On Behalf Of Duccio Fallani
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:39 AM
To: hylafax-users@hylafax.org
Subject: [hylafax-users] Hylafax vs traditional fax device


If I send the same document by Hylafax and traditional
fax device the quality result is different. I know
the problem is on Ghoscript conversion from Poscript
format into TIFF (dithering???).
How can I obtain the same document result of a traditional
fax with Hylafax/Ghostscript ???


Duccio Fallani


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*



____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*




Project hosted by iFAX Solutions