![]() |
On 2002.11.05 10:45 alt wrote: > I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean when you say "the > ANSWER response". The "ANSWER" response is what you are showing in your logs with tracing 257. Indeed, it does show CID data but only *after* it is parsed and digested by faxgetty. What you are claiming: that CID data is received by the modem and that faxgetty haphazardly ignores or misinterprets it can only be substantiated by logging the CID data *as received* by the modem which can be done with tracing 0xFFF. > how is the CID data that's being seen/shown for pid [120] in the logs > getting there? That's post-chewing CID data... not the fresh meat that we want to see. Lee. ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*