![]() |
The bottom line is: inserting !^<pattern>$ <-- as the first line in /var/spool/hylafax/etc/cid -- eg. ^8005551212$ also inserting ^.*$ <-- as the last line in /var/spool/hylafax/etc/cid The <pattern> shown in the first line is being accepted by hylafax1 when it should be 'CID REJECTED.' Looking at this from another angle, should I only place the following: ^<pattern>$ <-- as the first line in /var/spool/hylafax/etc/cid -- eg. ^8005551212$ The above line will *not be accepted/answered by hylafax. Lastly when I try inserting (as an only line in the etc/cid)--> ^$ <-- all incoming calls are accepted. It seems to me QualifyCID is not working properly. Its my understanding that ^$ means a null or empty string. The CID info is in-fact available (showing in my server log) What I think may be happening is; the patterns placed in etc/cid (in this instance) are being matched against the TSI info --and not-- CID info With my per-modem config files set to ... ServerTracing: 1 SessionTracing: 15 serverlogs do in fact show CID name and number However; my session logs will not show CID name and number information with the setting shown above. The session logs do show 'cid rejected' when QualifyCID is defined but etc/cid is empty. I don't need or use TSI screening. I need and want to screen via CID, providing we can figure what's going incorrectly here. Thanks for your thoughts. ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*