 HylaFAX The world's
most advanced open source fax server
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- To: Joe Matuscak <matuscak@rohrer.com>
- Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- From: "Vyacheslav Frolov" <v.frolov@globalone.ru>
- Cc: Lee Howard <faxguy@deanox.com>, hylafax-users@hylafax.org
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:55:56 +0400
Joe Matuscak wrote: > Sep 05 17:06:32.37: [ 959]: REMOTE best format 2-D MMR ... > Sep 05 17:06:32.37: [ 959]: USE 2-D MR REMOTE supports MMR so if the regular fax machine supports MMR too then HylaFAX performance will less (up to twice). Vyacheslav. ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- From: Joe Matuscak
- Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- References:
- Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- From: Joe Matuscak
- Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- Prev by Date: Re: [hylafax-users] faxing thru staroffice
- Next by Date: Re: [hylafax-users] Hylafax API : Howto make sure it sends a cover page
- Previous by thread: Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- Next by thread: Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.
- Index(es):
Project hosted by iFAX Solutions