![]() |
At 07:36 AM 8/2/2001Marc Silva sez: >I was using a old (slow - Pentium 150) machine to faxserver. >But now I'm using a "new" computer (more faster - AMD K6II 266) and >there's no more problem. >I'm using brooktrout MPM8 and Hylafax 4.1 with the same configuration. > >Some guys need to see deadlock problem with slow machine. > >see you... > >Marc Silva >IT Department >ebiznet corporation >marcs@ebiznet.com I use a 486/66 EISA machine which handles 100's of incoming faxes a day without problem. That is not a slow machine either. BTW, in 1986 through 1993 my fax was an IBM 8088 with 640K RAM running as a diskless workstation with Xerox MicroFAX card in it processing faxes round the clock. It had an attached XES Data Products 300 dpi 256 greyscale scanner with a sheet feeder and ran perfectly non-stop. This idea that a Pentium class machine is too slow for faxing seems appalling to me. If the machine has 16550 UARTS or better it should be able to support data at a cte/dte rate of 38,400 bps continuously considering the connection rate never exceeds 14.4kbps, processing the incoming TIFF files or outgoing TIFF plus conversion to/from postscript and driving a printer as only a light load for a 386. In fact, I have a very nice 386/25 running Redhat Linux 5.2 with 16550 UARTS. I think I will run HylaFAX just to prove that the world that faxing is not big deal. If you recall, a 386/25 was lightning quick compared to a 10 MHz XT. ** L I N U X ** .~. Paul A. Franz, P.E. Engineering Software The Choice /V\ Blackdog Software Network Consulting and Sales of the GNU /( )\ <http://blackdog.bellevue.wa.us/> Custom Web Services Generation ^^-^^ (425) 641-8202, (425) 641-1773 FAX Internet FAX ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null