![]() |
Lee Howard wrote: > Can anyone confirm that the faxcover 'commentsX' symbols/parameters > function properly? Or rather, can anyone confirm that they *don't* > function properly? I'm having extreme trouble implementing the usage of > 'commentsX'... faxcover splits text at '\n' chars into CommentX, where X is [1-9\:\;\<\=\>\?\@A-D]. For example: /usr/local/bin/faxcover -c '0\n\n0123456789\n01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789' ... defines the following entries in the dictionary [/Comment4 (01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789)] [/Comment3 (0123456789)] [/Comment2 ()] [/Comment1 (0)] [/Comment5 ()] [/Comment6 ()] [/Comment7 ()] [/Comment8 ()] [/Comment9 ()] [/Comment: ()] [/Comment; ()] [/Comment< ()] [/Comment= ()] [/Comment> ()] [/Comment? ()] [/Comment@ ()] [/CommentA ()] [/CommentB ()] [/CommentC ()] [/CommentD ()] ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null