Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX failing my abuse test

[DeWitt, Michael <mjdewitt@alexcommgrp.com>]

I don't believe that signal 11's are compile specific but may show up
anywhere.  They are mentioned in the faq in regard to compiles since kernel
compiles are one of the most demanding processes most users run so that weak
hardware shows its soft spots.  I ran into a signal 11 problem myself in
setting up a new machine which was overclocked and turned its speed until
the signal 11's went away.  I ran two instances of seti@home and a kernel
compile to try to force the signal 11's on a rh6.0 smp box.  This may not be
your issue, but one I think you will probably need to explore.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	HALLOWELL,KARL (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [SMTP:karl_hallowell@hp.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, Oct 24, 2000 4:19 PM
> To:	DeWitt, Michael; 'hylafax-users@hylafax.org'
> Subject:	Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX failing my abuse test
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DeWitt, Michael [mailto:mjdewitt@alexcommgrp.com]
> > 
> > 
> > I don't know what OS you are running, but you may want to 
> > look into the
> > Signal 11 faq at http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ .  It may be 
> > just a hardware
> > problem.
> 
> Thanks for the info. I'm pretty sure this isn't the problem. Apparently
> the
> signal 11 error above occurs during compile time. I have the right kind of
> OS, but the hylafax error occurs during run-time not compile time.
> 
> 
> Karl Hallowell          karl_hallowell@hp.com
> 
> 


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null