![]() |
Wout Mertens wrote: > But now that I have contacted you, I would much rather just extend WHFC to > accept attachments. > The best way IMHO would be to accept a list of files and let WHFC print > those. This minimizes the user work involved. I have outlined a way to do > this in the mailing list. Hi, WHFC itselve will not process any documents. I don't want to implement such a processing since WHFC is a client, wich simply sends postscript or tiff/g3 to the HylaFAX server and gives a user interface to the server. > An alternative, and very simple, too, is to wait with sending the job until > the user says it can be sent, and in the mean while accept all print jobs, > and send these as attachments. As I said, I would be happy to help you code > it, I just need to have the feature :) > In fact, I think that both methods could be equally useful (e.g. when you > want to fax part of a picture vs. you want to fax ten documents), so maybe > it is best to have both methods? You can write an own programm/macro which merges all the documents attachements etc and prints them out in a single postscript file. You can use the OLE interface from WHFC to send this file to the HylaFAX server. I have currently no idea how to do such a document process wich you have described in your previous mails. Uli -- Ulrich Eckhardt Tr@nscom http://people.frankfurt.netsurf.de/uli http://www.transcom.de Lagerstra�e 11-15 A8 64807 Dieburg Germany