![]() |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Christopher Biow wrote: > Bodo Bock wrote: > > >The faxgetty seems to be missing: > >... > >Check for a line > > > >mo:23:respawn:/usr/lib/fax/faxgetty ttyS1 > > > >in /etc/inittab > > That's it! Thank you very much. A command line "/usr/sbin/faxgetty -D > ttyS1" fixes the problem and makes faxes begin to send. > > I'm uncertain, though, about what the correct, canonical place would be for > starting the faxgetty in RedHat. At runlevels 1-5, the .rpm setup invokes > /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax, which includes a specific comment that " This > script assumes faxgetty processes are managed by init". Why would it not be > in the init.d script, which would allow restarting of all hylafax daemons > at once? Ahh. Because there are *LOTS* of things that can nuke or crash or close a faxgetty. If that happens, you want it to restart automatically, so it goes in /etc/inittab which monitors the condition of the serial lines for exactly this sort of use. > If I do put faxgetty in inittab, I presume I'd want something more like > this for RH6.0, to include runlevels 4 and 5 and accommodate the different > path: > > fax:2345:respawn:/usr/sbin/faxgetty ttyS1 > > Does that look safe? It looks *safe*. I'd actually only use runlevels 3 and 5, for when there is a network connection present. Nobody really *USES* run levels 2 and 4 normally. The run levels on Linux are as follows: 0 shut down 1 single user 2 not normally used 3 active network 4 not normally used 5 active network with XDM style login 6 shut down Nico Kadel-Garcia Senior Engineer, CIRL Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBODhVtD/+ItycgIJRAQHhkgQAgoVDMJRT79iz5BzKy8qjAxAujdDKLjQl cs3zwFOSTy/aLuhFBcrwtkjIzalzhTA7hE9SmTZtakqI+qmjTffvu9pvZ8Nx4pi3 BLPc4J+EGynAzGJHyJYCD5G12csyemclzzwq7B/FtRpAEfxH693iDceRwRiZULsP L8H144XGmIA= =2Pww -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----