Re: flexfax: Problem with WHFC Today

[Nico Kadel-Garcia <raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Olivier, our faithful protagonist, had an entry for hfaxd in /etc/inetd.conf
that caused a second hfaxd process to run and wedged contacts from his
WHFC clients. The saga continues here:

On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Olivier SAULNIER wrote:

> Ok for posting in HYLAFAX mailing list, sorry...
> 
> I've delete the hylafax entry from /etc/inetd.conf. It's better ,but some 
> faxes(#1 / 10) are blocked on the same problem, but the process created is:
> [root@linux /etc]# ps -ef|grep fax
> uucp       633     1  0 16:19 ?        00:00:00 /usr/sbin/faxq
> uucp       635     1  0 16:19 ?        00:00:00 /usr/sbin/hfaxd -i hylafax
> uucp       740   635  0 16:25 ?        00:00:00 /usr/sbin/hfaxd -i hylafax
> 
> Thank for your help.
> 
> Olivier SAULNIER
> interchim.comp@interchim.com

Take a battleaxe to the running faxq and hfaxd processes, and restart
them from the /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax script. Kill off all the old
ones first and make *SURE* they're dead....


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBODQXgD/+ItycgIJRAQGd5gP/SudoXOepSQNU+09iSQsEAa1C3iJV8jBj
avQOSmqTMX/Wkv8+xOq0HH9hf/ufwFLn97te0XctVygYVuGKzAXysD8s8nqLAIJi
yfLjc82basrN7zMmIrcDEsLzc1ulgDhtmc8dc5ZljOFAmBbYpBtJltMIcH4LM8Jo
EXPegpHz+wU=
=xYZJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----