![]() |
> Greetings: > Please forgive me if this is a duplicate, but there is evidence that this did not make it to the list on the first attempt 2 days ago. > I have been playing with HylaFAX on and off for some of months now. > Recently, I have been doing more intensive testing and am puzzled by how > the > compression/encoding works. Some things lead me to believe that the modem > does the encoding. For example from the Multitech document "Class 2 Fax > Developer's Kit" page 23 indicates that 2-D MR and 2-D MMR are not > supported. But then some things indicate that HylaFAX does the encoding. > For example, from man page HYLAFAX(5F) "Documents are automatically > converted to TIFF/F documents prior to transmission according to the > capabilities of the remote fascimile machine: maximum page width and > length, ability to handle 2-D encoded data, ...". > > Of the 15 or so numbers I have used for testing, all but 2 list their > capabilities as "supports2DEncoding:yes", yet all the completed email > messages indicate that 1-D encoding was used. (This is not quite true, a > few pages were noted to have used 2-D, but that was a month ago and the > modems used then are not the same as the ones I am using now.) The config > man page indicates that Use2D defaults to yes and I have not explicitly > set > it otherwise anywhere. So why is 2-D compression not being used? I am > sending test documents at 196lines/inch vertical resolution pages in about > 1.5 minutes/page (granted, these are busy pages) and feel that 2-D > encoding > would improve this time greatly. > > What am I missing? > > Thanks for all tips > > Jonathan