![]() |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:17:39AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > I get the error message: > > > "Hmmm, there does not appear to be an fuser command on your machine. This > > > means that I an unable to insure that all processes using the modem have > > > been killed. I will keep going but be aware that you may have competition > > > for the modem" > > > > Jeff, look for other jobs that have things running on /dev/modem or > > /dev/ttyS1. mgetty (if you have that installed!), minicom, PPP, etc. > > "fuser" should *not* fail. > Forgive me, Nico, but doesn't that message mean that fuser is > _missing_, rather than merely not running? Actually, no. This is an unfortunate aspect of many error messages in systems maintained by people without a manager to tell them "make the messages correct for every possibility": it wasn't able to successfully *RUN* fuser, and assumes you actually don't have one. It's not always right about it. The odds of a modern OS not having fuser is quite small. If you run "sh -x `which faxaddmodem`", you should be able to see exactly what it does with the fuser that generates this message. Nico Kadel-Garcia Senior Engineer, CIRL Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBN6YXoT/+ItycgIJRAQFTSQP/djkIVQiR2zbT0irRzp18v8rwEH4WcWbF RICkKOoNlLW6zs3kM+PfD9fXTYG2ByEVIDVqTK/04TSBID1Em40UCNfW0lrJOCfu UnKGw4qAbkvcfD7XUkSuh+BYQpPiJzFTOZFGEr0B2yZWqRnWLdlBW4D7nqHYGPmE bywauYhiD6c= =KgQ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----