![]() |
Under normal circumstances, empty TSI is read as <unspecified> and I can received them. >From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> >To: choonhian@hotmail.com (Chua Choon Hian) >CC: flexfax@sgi.com >Subject: Re: flexfax: Fw: facsimile not received >Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:24:18 +0100 (BST) >MIME-Version: 1.0 >From david@djwhome.demon.co.uk Sun Jul 04 03:17:58 1999 >Received: from [158.152.19.5] by hotmail.com (1.5) with SMTP id >MHotMailB9487FD4007FD821979C9E98130518ED0; Sun Jul 04 03:17:58 1999 >Received: (from david@localhost) by djwhome.demon.co.uk (8.8.8/8.7.3) id >LAA02495; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:24:18 +0100 >Message-Id: <199907031024.LAA02495@djwhome.demon.co.uk> >In-Reply-To: <19990702040445.58483.qmail@hotmail.com> from "Chua Choon >Hian" at Jul 2, 99 12:04:45 pm >X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] > > > > > I did define a etc/tsi list but TSI "" is not in my list. Why is it > > rejecting faxes with ""? All other faxes that are not in the reject >list > > can come through without problem. > >An empty TSI would normally be associated with a junk fax in the UK; >are you sure it is worth solving this one - it would be better to turn >off TSI checking entirely if you are prepared to accept empty TSIs. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com