![]() |
Phil Watkinson wrote: > > > >We have been on the same official revision (4.0pl2) for at least the > >last 9 months. The www.hylafax.org site has been setup (which is great > >- but where are your names? - I know Robert Colquhoun is one of them), > >but it still just gives a list of patches to apply. Still no new > >release. > > > > The team behind hylafax.org is separate from the maintainer and the > development of the source code. Anyway, are names important? You can > always contact us either through this list or via webmaster@hylafax.org. Actually I think the names are important. It is akin to the names of contributors at the top of piece of code. I would like to be able to mention you guys in my thanks! > >I see a lot of good, talented & motivated people running around this > >list. I think it is time we moved forward.... > > I agree. They are people willing to make a consistent contribution to > HylaFAX, David Woolley, as you point out, a prime example. I wish > sometimes that there were more coders available to help. I think you will fine there are a lot more out there than you might think. I for one made some minor mods to the code, posted the patches to the list and then it essentially went quiet. Not very encouraging for others to see. I think once the code is opened up, more people will post up their minor changes. > >........ If not, I think it is time > >we did the unthinkable and forked the code. > > Let's leave it at that - unthinkable. No maybe it shouldn't be unthinkable. However it should be the absolute last resort. A threat if you like. As a maintainer, you have to be both provide direction and listen to your community. If you stop listening, then forking is what happens. It keeps the maintainers on the straight and narrow. > >So guys I think it is time for Hylafax 4.1! Take all those patches - > >shove them in there and just shove it up on the Hylafax web site. If > >not, I'm going to put it up on mine. It will create lots of confusion > >and hassle, but if its the only way to start this project moving > >again, it'll be worth it. > > We desperately need a new patch level, and the quickest way that is > going to happen is to build on the work that has been happening > behind the scenes over the last few months. Agreed. Damian -- ______________________________________________________________________ * Damian Ivereigh * || || * Cisco Systems, Inc. * * MIS Printer Admin * .||||. .||||. * Sydney, Australia * * Linux Bigot * ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. * +61 2 8448 7344 * * damian@cisco.com * cisco Systems, Inc. * Fax: +61 2 8448 7228 * *______________________________________________________________________*