![]() |
David Woolley wrote: > > > Does Hylafax support DID (assuming the modem does, etc)? > > I don't think it does, but then there are no modems in the UK with special > support for DID as DID is only available over digital trunks as non > channel associated signalling. I'm surprised that there is any > significant market for them in the USA. Are they used to simulate > multiple lines on one physical line, or does the PABX route the > DID digits forwards to the extensions? In the latter case, is there > really a national standard for such signalling? I am not sure about standards and such, but I am pretty sure in the US you can talk nicely to your phone company and they will allow you do what you say, i.e. simulate multiple lines on a single line. I thought this was how direct dialling through to an extension worked with PABX's. I just presumed that the PABX could in turn map the same "extensions" through to a physical line and pass through the DID info (same as the phone co). I know this is the favourite way of routing incoming faxes at the moment. Just showing my ignorance. Damian -- ______________________________________________________________________ * Damian Ivereigh * || || * Cisco Systems, Inc. * * MIS Printer Admin * .||||. .||||. * Sydney, Australia * * Linux Bigot * ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. * +61 2 8448 7344 * * damian@cisco.com * cisco Systems, Inc. * Fax: +61 2 8448 7228 * *______________________________________________________________________*