![]() |
On Tue, 26 May 1998, Dave Parker wrote: > >Well, FYI I've finished adding my wishlist to the RPM, and once I build in > >Nico's stuff I'll be looking for people to give it a try. The previous author > >broke out man pages and html docs into separate packages, something I've yet > >to remove, but plan to. Da' people need da' dox, I say. > > Yes. The docs are great. There are an awful lot of 'em, but this ain't > M$ we're talkin' about here! Hi, Dave. There's no need to make separate RPMs for code and docs. There's a facility within RPM that allows a packager to flag files as documentation, that can be treated separately at install and query time. For instance, rpm -qd pine will display the pine documentation on a system (assuming that pine was installed using RPM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Evan Leibovitch * Xunil Computing * Brampton, Ontario, Canada * www.xunil.com Supporting Intel-based Unix and Linux since 1985 * Caldera & SCO authorized Ask me about the Toronto Linux Users Group