![]() |
I've searched the FAQ and the mailing list archives for this one to no avail... I'm running HylaFAX 4.0pl0 on an IPX running Solaris 2.4 with a Multitech 2834ZDX 28.8 fax modem on cua/a, which I'm trying to use in Class 2 mode (the modem doesn't support 2.0). When I send a fax (to my PC, which runs Windows 95, QuickLink II fax software with an AT&T Paradyne 14.4 modem), the modems connect, then the first page of a two-page fax is sent 3 times, then a fourth page (can't tell if it's the second page or another copy of the first) is sent, but it's so squished it fits in about half an inch at the top of the page. An EOP is never sent; instead the call is aborted, according to this portion of the session log: Feb 23 08:07:51.74: [23292]: SENT 23896 bytes of data Feb 23 08:07:51.74: [23292]: <-- data [2] Feb 23 08:07:53.72: [23292]: SEND end page Feb 23 08:07:54.75: [23292]: --> [2:OK] Feb 23 08:07:54.75: [23292]: SEND send MPS (more pages, same document) Feb 23 08:07:54.75: [23292]: <-- [9:AT+FET=0\r] Feb 23 08:08:04.02: [23292]: --> [7:+FPTS:2] Feb 23 08:08:04.02: [23292]: --> [2:OK] Feb 23 08:08:04.02: [23292]: SEND recv RTN (retrain negative) Feb 23 08:08:04.03: [23292]: <-- [6:AT+FK\r] Feb 23 08:08:05.61: [23292]: --> [7:+FHNG:2] Feb 23 08:08:05.61: [23292]: REMOTE HANGUP: Call aborted, from +FK or <CAN> (code 2) Feb 23 08:08:06.25: [23292]: --> [2:OK] Feb 23 08:08:06.25: [23292]: <-- [5:ATH0\r] Feb 23 08:08:06.52: [23292]: --> [2:OK] Feb 23 08:08:06.53: [23292]: SESSION END I'm using software flow control because of what I've read about bugs in Solaris 2.4 with hardware flow control, but I've had the same behavior both ways. I have no problem receiving faxes, and they seem to be okay in their format. The troubleshooting documentation mentions a patch for Solaris 2.4 to make it "do" hardware flow control. Does anyone know what that patch number is? I found one that looked like it might help, number 102062, but it's not available on the public patch site, and I don`t have a service contract. Upgrading to Solaris 2.5 is not currently an option, at least not until I make some more money this year (actually, I'm more likely to go to Linux). Would I be better off using the AT&T modem instead of the Multitech? I decided to go with the Multitech because it supports Class2, which the AT&T does not, and because I'd also like to use it for dialup someday. I don't know much about modems, so please be gentle... Please reply directly to me if you can help -- I'm not subscribed to this list; I only read the archives. Thanks very much for any help! Leslie Dreyer Kalra Techies, Inc. lbd@techiesinc.com